Here are some of the most common false negatives that occur with automated testing:Ī major shortcoming of programs and machines is that they can’t understand the context or purpose of content this means that they also can’t determine the compliance of a website’s structural layout or organization of content.
False negatives are more concerning than false positives, as this will often result in barriers for individuals with disabilities being overlooked. The lists below show some of the testing you can perform with each option.Īs stated above, one of the issues with automated testing is the fact that reports can generate false positives or false negatives. Ultimately, the best option for testing accessibility is to combine both automated and manual testing.
In addition, many are not confident that they could catch every potential accessibility issue if they did pick through their site manually. Determining whether or not your website and/or application is compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) or other accessibility regulations can be a frustrating experience.Īutomated tools are most organization's first choice for scanning their site for issues, which makes sense, as most sites are simply too large and complex to comb through by hand. However, we they cannot be used for every part of the process. Automated testing tools can be used as a routine part of the accessibility testing process.